Motion to Compel Omitted Basic Audio and Video Discovery

After reviewing video and audiotapes provided by Westport Police, it is apparent the following 4 aspects/times of the “investigation” and arrest of me (James Lawrence) are not provided, though these times are previously recorded for there is evidence of Officer Grasso on the premises of my apartment.

1: In Discovery Evidence provided by Westport Police is a video interview with Complainant. The Officer walks out of interview saying he will be “right back” yet there is no other coverage of the remainder of the interview/taking of complaint. It is obviously missing because the interview is short in length leaving Complainant sitting there thumbing through text messages waiting for him.
2: In Arrest Warrant, Complainant is mentioned coming to the police station 2-3 times yet there is only 1/2 of one interview provided (as previously mention in #1:) and nothing when Complainant provided sworn written statement 9/25/2018. Once again, in that 1/2 interview is a mention to a visit/discussion Complainant and Officer had at my apartment some time earlier yet there is no audio or video coverage of this event provided. There is only a verification audio of being at the apartment.
3: In one of the audiotapes, records the Officer Grasso/officers going out to my apartment to take a complaint from Complainant yet there is no taping of him getting out of the car and interviewing/speaking to Complainant nor any kind of coverage in the form of video or audiotapes of anything. It is evident in police reports and arrest warrant that there was a prolonged stay at my apartment and even within my apartment. Given the fact that police record all their visits I ask that this interaction with Complainant be immediately turned over. There can be NO EXCUSE for omitting this recorded visit and that includes “technical difficulties bs” for there is no coverage at all yet established audio when officer arrives on the property, a long visit often mentioned in police reports and arrest warrant.
4: It is established Officer Grasso knew of my whereabouts at the time of the complaint that included me being at the police station looking to make a complaint. Officer Grasso claims in video that “ I called him” which is a nonsensical lie, and that he tried to call me in September yet there is no proof provided he attempted to call me, as well as the admitted fact he knew of my whereabouts and never attempted to visit me or parents (co-landlords) after complaint let alone after he learned a day after complaint that I was trying to deliver a complaint myself at the Westport Police Station. I ask that proof of this call to me in September 2018 be turned over in a form of at least a recording of the voice mail as he has stated was left on my voice mail. Keep in mind, all voice greetings by me since July 2018 have directed people to email me at my email on file with the clerk because I do not live here.  The “investigating” officer never Emailed me as well. THIS EMAIL WAS AND IS THE WAY I HAVE BEEN COMMUNICATING SINCE JULY 2018.

Since these audio and videotapes exist, Discovery evidence should be completed for it has been over 70 days since Motion for Discovery with multiple deadlines passed, of an alleged Email crime from Sept. 2018 over 8 months ago. I look forward to discussing this Motion for Basic Audio and Video Discovery along with already filed Motion to Dismiss based on Failure to Disclose Basic Discovery Evidence Written in Arrest Warrant as well as/and/OR Prosecutorial Misconduct, and/OR Lack of Evidence.

THIS AUDIO AND VIDEO EVIDENCE IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR IT SHOWS IN DETAILS HOW THE SECOND WESTPORT NEWS ARTICLE ABOUT MY MARCH 5, 20-18 ARREST FOR SECOND DEGREE BREACH OF PEACE (the hideous MARCH 23, 2018 ARTICLE after the fair March 11, 2018 article) AKA “SPECIAL” HIT JOB/SLANDEROUS AND LIBELOUS WESTPORT NEWS ARTICLE ALL BEFORE DUE PROCESS OF LAW ARTICLE, HAS CREATED UTTER CHAOS ENDANGERING MY LIFE. THIS ARTICLE DOXXED ME OF ALLEGED “INCIDENTS” THAT WERE ALREADY INVESTIGATED LONG AGO AND NEVER RESULTED IN ARRESTS AND NEVER CAN BE OR WILL BE ARRESTED FOR, AND IT DOXXED ME OF A CHARGE THAT NEVER BECAME A CONVICTION, HENCE MY ONE AND ONLY 1995 CONVICTION.

THESE AUDIO AND VIDEOS SHOW COMPLAINANT MENTIONING THIS WESTPORT NEWS ARTICLE/HIT JOB/SUCKER PUNCH YET OFFICER GRASSO NEVER MENTIONS THIS OBVIOUS ANTAGONIST/SECOND WESTPORT NEWS ARTICLE THAT IS MAKING PEOPLE PARANOID IN HIS DUBIOUS ARREST WARRANT. YOU CANNOT BE ACCUSED BECAUSE SOMEONE READS A SLANDREOUS ARTICLE THAT IS IN LITIGATION BECAUSE IT CAME ABOUT BEFORE ANY PROPER DUE PROCESS OF LAW! THERE HAS BEEN NO PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE WHATSOEVER AND TO THIS DAY I HAVE NOT BEEN CONVICTED OF ANYTHING NOR WILL I EVER BE.  YET THIS MUCKRAKING GARBAGE IS ALLOWED TO PERSECUTE ME AND CAUSE SO MANY DAMAGES THAT HAVE ME LIVING ELSEWHERE FIGHTING MORE LAWSUITS TO CLEAR MY NAME. 

IN THE AUDIO AND VIDEOS IS MORE PROOF OF HOW THIS UNJUST MEDIA STORM CAME ABOUT AGAINST ME. CATTY COMPLAINANT ’ FEIGNS SHE NEVER KNEW OF THIS ARTCLE AND MY 2018 ARREST, BUT ALL EMAIL AND TEXT EVIDENCE SHOWS SHE KNEW EVERYTHING ABOUT MY ARREST SINCE EARLY JULY – 3+ WEEKS BEFORE SHE MOVED INTO MY APARTMENT!!!. THESE AUDIOS AND VIDEOS CATCH COMPLAINANT ONCE AGAIN MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS aka PERJURY – LYING, WHICH IS WHY ALL INTERVIEWS AND CONTACT BETWEEN THIS COMPLAINANT (with a Gaelic name meaning ‘crooked mouth’) WITH THE WESTPORT POLICE ARE TO BE HANDED OVER IMMEDIATELY, ESPECIALLY OFFICER GRASSO”S (an Italian name meaning ‘fat’) VISIT TO AND WITHIN MY APARTMENT WHEN VISITING THE CONNIVING WITCH!!!. ALL VIDEOS AND AUDIO ESPECIALLY WHEN THESE TWO AGENDA-DRIVEN CHARACTERS ARE TOGETHER TALKING, ARE TO BE HANDED OVER FOR I CANNOT FILE A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CLAIM FOR THIS TYPE OF DISCOVERY EVIDENCE!!!! 

I HEREBY COMPEL FOR THIS RECORDED INFORMATION. IF IT IS NOT AVAILABLE, THIS IS YET AGAIN ANOTHER OBVIOUS (WITH A WHOLE LOT MORE COMING) EXAMPLE OF EVIDENCE IN MY FAVOR BEING CONCEALED AND THUS AN IMMEDIATED DISMISSAL OF CASE WOULD BE IN ORDER.

5:  After even further review, it is also true that video of me during arrest/booking is omitted. There is no video of what I was saying when getting finger printed. It took a very long to get finger printed and there is no video of this process and conversations with officers at all!!  I HEREBY move to COMPEL the police to hand over all omitted videos or audios that I have mentioned – 5 now. 

IN SUM
1: - completed interview with Complainant shared in part as Discovery.
2: - all visits from Complainant to police station.
3: - the time officer was at my apartment showed throughout arrest warrant. THIS IS CRUCIAL AND OUTRAGEOUSLY OMITTED!!!
4: - the proof of how “I called him” as Officer states in video and how “he called me”, which includes the voicemail greeting I had/have.
5: - this omitted video of me during booking when it took a very long time to process finger printing and gave me a platform to discuss so much more.